bee on a yellow flower closeup

To ‘BEE’ or not to ‘BEE’ … that is the question.

In response to some of the current concerns and conflicting views on natural gardens and the City’s commitment to honour its certification as a ‘Bee City’ … Sustainable Orillia has drafted the following letter for Council and our Mayor to take into consideration in their deliberations on this matter.


Letter to the Editor


As active advocates for sustainable living, we in Sustainable Orillia have to express concern over the recent predicament faced by Stacie Theis and her yard’s diverse ecosystem. Her situation reveals the clash between Orillia’s ‘Bee City’ designation, its climate action goals, and the enforcement of Chapter 834, bringing to light the need for an important conversation about the significance of embracing biodiversity and the need for adaptable bylaws.

Orillia’s commendable decision to become a “Bee City” in 2019 was an emblem of its dedication to promoting pollinator habitats and supporting ecosystems that drive our natural world. Stacie Theis’s decision to nurture her property’s native plants—welcoming a myriad of insects, bees, and other creatures—is a living embodiment of this commitment. It’s a demonstration of how individual choices can align with a collective vision for a more sustainable future.

However, the enforcement of Chapter 834’s guidelines, particularly the restriction on vegetation height, appears to contradict the city’s overarching objectives. The dichotomy between protecting biodiversity and enforcing a traditional standard of yard aesthetics raises a fundamental question about the importance of municipal codes being adaptable—and adapted—to align with evolving environmental values.

Stacie Theis aptly highlights the incongruity of equating natural growth, such as the Goldenrod flowers on her property, with industrial waste. In an era when cities worldwide are recognizing the critical role native flora plays in combating climate change and supporting essential pollinators, it’s imperative that local legislation reflects this understanding. A well-maintained natural habitat like Theis’s lawn can actively reduce our carbon footprint, conserve water, and contribute to a healthier ecosystem.

Furthermore, the suggestion to amend the bylaw’s height restriction to accommodate native pollinator plantsmakes ecological sense. Native plants can indeed reach varying heights and play a pivotal role in nurturing biodiversity. Scientific insights should guide bylaws to ensure they support, rather than hinder, the flourishing of native species.

We appreciate the Orillia City Council’s initiative in addressing “chronic problem properties,” but as we navigate the future, it’s crucial to strike a balance between enforcing standards and nurturing diverse, ecologically-conscious landscapes. Sustainable Orillia urges the City to reconsider the implications of Chapter 834 in light of Orillia’s ‘Bee City’ status and broader environmental goals. Collaborative dialogue between citizens, experts, and local officials can pave the way for solutions that honour both community standards and environmental stewardship.

In closing, let us remember that the health of our planet depends on our ability to harmonize human progress with the needs of the natural world. The story of Stacie Theis’s yard is a reminder that each one of us has the power to create positive change and inspire others to follow suit. Let’s continue to cultivate a vibrant community that thrives for generations to come.

Sustainable Orillia would be most interested in supporting the City’s work to rationalize its Bylaws with its commitment to a more sustainable community


Stan Mathewson, President

Sustainable Orillia




join us
Become a friend of Sustainable Orillia and be part of a growing movement. Your donation directly supports our programs, activities and publications.
you may also like